Dr Martin Parsons
Dr Martin Parsons
  • Home
  • My priorities for Mersea and Pyefleet
  • Challenges affecting our local area
  • Latest news
  • Letters (Daily Telegraph, County Standard etc.)
  • Coastal erosion and sea level rise
  • Local History
  • Videos
    • Contact
  • Articles for local press

Published letters

Martin has had letters published both in the local press and in the Daily Telegraph, Times and (Dublin's) Irish Times

About Martin

Daily Telegraph

5/12/2022

 

Glorious Revolution

Anthony Pick (letters 12 May) rightly highlights the significance for constitutional monarchy of the 1688-9 “Glorious Revolution”. Of equal importance is its role in the constitutional development of freedom of religion and its later spread across the world.
In England, the 1689 Toleration Act permitted worship outside the established church for the first time. Prior this, thousands of dissenters such as John Bunyan had faced imprisonment or even execution for expressing beliefs that did not conform to the politically dominant belief system of the day. While in Scotland, the accession of William and Mary drew a final line under the attempt of the Stuart kings to impose their own beliefs on the Scottish Church. This had led to the bloodiest period of religious persecution in British history, which is still known in Scotland as “the killing times”, reflecting the large numbers judicially or extra-judicially killed for their faith.
These are lessons politicians today need to remember.
 
Dr Martin Parsons
West Mersea, Essex

Brexit border in Ireland

9/11/2020

 
The EU claim the UK is breaching international law by its internal market bill clarifying that there will be no customs barrier between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK. However, International Human Rights Conventions, including Article 1 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which all EU members have signed, guarantees all countries
 “the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”
Similarly, the United Nations has long stated that “Any attempt aimed at the partial or total disruption of the national unity and the territorial integrity of a country is incompatible with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations.”
I drew attention to this in an article for Brexit Central at the time the Withdrawal Agreement was first proposed.
 
Dr Martin Parsons

Daily Telegraph

8/26/2019

 

Tercentenary of British Parliament leading the global development of freedom of religion by beginning repeal of the Test Acts

Charles Moore (Telegraph 24 August) rightly observes that universities should be as concerned about the Test Acts as they are about past complicity with slavery. The Test Acts excluded Catholics and Dissenters from education as well as certain professions and political office. Between 1719 and 1871 the British parliament abolished the various Test Acts beginning with the Schism Act which had excluded non-Anglicans from being school teachers and prohibited higher education establishments known as dissenting academies. In 1871 the Universities Test Act repealed laws requiring academics at Cambridge, Oxford and Durham to hold Anglican beliefs.
Although little remembered today it is hard to overstate the importance of repeal of the Test Acts as they marked the achievement of full freedom of religion in the UK and its spread across the world. Countries such as the USA and Australia, which branched off from Britain during or immediately after this period, wrote specific clauses into their constitutions prohibiting any future government from requiring assent to particular beliefs for those in public office.
This is a history that universities should carefully reflect on, not least in the light of current attempts on some campuses to censor students and outside speakers who dissent from politically correct orthodoxy or hold minority religious beliefs.
Dr Martin Parsons

Irish Times (Dublin)

12/7/2017

 

Brexit and Ireland
(within 24 hours of publication the Irish government removed their objections to the UK and EU progressing to to the next stage of Brexit talks)

Over the past 20 years I have seen nothing but genuine warmth by British people towards the Irish. Our distrust of the EU has never been transferred to Ireland. Indeed, EU insistence that Ireland vote again after rejecting the Lisbon Treaty created much sympathy.
That is sadly now changing and being replaced in mainland Britain by rising anger at what is seen as Leo Varadkar’s unwarranted aggression. His proposals are viewed as violating our territorial integrity and seeking to subject us after Brexit to laws created in a foreign country and a court in a foreign land.
When Ireland became an independent, sovereign nation it rejected government by the UK and laws made by our parliament. It is therefore deeply disappointing that the Irish government of all people seems unable to understand this is exactly what the UK is doing by leaving the EU.
No-one wants a hard border. However, we find it incomprehensible that Mr Varadkar is now the main obstacle to the only thing which can prevent that between two independent sovereign countries – a free-trade agreement.
It is a tragedy that peace and goodwill built up over the last 20 years is being jeopardised this way.
Dr Martin Parsons
​

Daily Telegraph

1/3/2017

 

Extremism and British values

3rd January 2017
David Anderson is wrong. The only way extremism can be defined is in relation to Britain’s historic national values such as parliamentary democracy and sovereignty, one law applying equally to all people and enforced by an independent judiciary, freedom of speech, freedom of religion and freedom of the press.
These values have evolved over many centuries and become embedded in our national institutions.
The threat of those holding conservative religious views being unfairly targeted comes from attempts by social liberals to hijack British values and replace them with their own sectarian values.
Such attempts themselves undermine our national values such as freedom of religion – the existence of which has been one of the principal reasons that victims of religious persecution overseas have sought refuge in our country for the last four centuries.
​Dr Martin Parsons

Daily Telegraph

7/21/2015

 

Freedom of Religion

Sir
Freedom of religion has historically been a central British value. This includes allowing people to hold public office without requiring them to subscribe to certain beliefs. The 1719 repeal of the Schism Act allowed non Anglicans to become teachers, the 1778 Catholic Relief Act allowed Catholics to join the army, the 1828 repeal of the Test and Corporations Acts and 1829 Catholic Emancipation Act allowed non Anglicans to become local councillors and MPs. This was extended to Jews by the 1858 Jewish Relief Act and Atheists by the 1888 Oaths Act. Sadly, the historic core value of religious freedom is now under attack not just from Islamists but also from a new intolerant version of Liberalism. This seeks to impose its own ethical beliefs on wider society and exclude from public participation anyone who disagrees with them – which on occasion has included those holding historic Christian beliefs. However, genuine toleration means tolerating people you disagree with, not seeking to impose your views on them. That is the only basis a free society can exist on.

​Dr Martin Parsons

Daily Telegraph

1/27/2014

 

Democratic deficit in sea defence
- written the month after major east coast floods and during the Somerset Levels floods

The chief executive of the Environment Agency states that he is deciding whether to repair or abandon sea defences breached by last month’s tidal surge in Suffolk and Norfolk.
Where cost is an issue coastal communities can potentially look for alternative funding streams. However, a more fundamental issue is the assumption of the Environment Agency that it will decide whether to maintain or abandon sea defences.  This issue is simply too important to local communities to be decided by a non governmental body. This ‘democratic deficit’ was made significantly worse by the 2010 Flood and Water Management Act rushed through parliament without proper scrutiny in the last few days before the 2010 general election. Section 38 of this gives wide ranging powers to the Environment Agency to actually create either flooding or coastal erosion where it believes these are justified for what are in practice a wide ranging set of reasons.
There is an urgent need for the government to review both this act and the wider issue of how decisions are taken in relation to whether to maintain or abandon sea defences. It is clearly inappropriate for unelected civil servants to be taking decisions about whether to abandon large areas of the land to the sea.
Dr Martin Parsons

Forward>>

    Archives

    December 2023
    November 2023
    July 2023
    December 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    September 2020
    August 2019
    December 2017
    January 2017
    July 2015
    January 2014

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.